Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether polished steel balls manufactured by the assessee were classifiable under Heading 84.82 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule or under Heading 73.26 / sub-heading 7326.11.
Analysis: Chapter Note 6 of Chapter 84 applied Heading 84.82 to polished steel balls where the maximum and minimum diameters did not differ from the nominal diameter by more than 1% or 0.05 mm, whichever was less. The test report showed that the goods were polished steel balls satisfying that tolerance. The entry under Heading 73.26 covered only forged or stamped articles of iron or steel not further worked, whereas the goods in question had been further worked by polishing. The earlier decisions relied on by the assessee were distinguished on the ground that the steel balls there were not polished.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 84.82 and not under Heading 73.26 or sub-heading 7326.11. The classification adopted by the adjudicating authority was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Polished steel balls satisfying the tolerance prescribed in Chapter Note 6 of Chapter 84 are classifiable under Heading 84.82, and not under the heading meant for forged or stamped iron or steel articles not further worked.