1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rules in favor of appellant on duty payable for LPG cylinders</h1> The tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the correct assessable value and duty payable on LPG cylinders manufactured for Indian Oil Company. ... Demand - Limitation - Unintended misstatement Issues involved: Appeal against Order-in-original regarding correct assessable value and duty payable on LPG cylinders manufactured on job work basis for Indian Oil Company (IOC) from November 1984 to October 1986.Summary:The appellant, engaged in manufacturing LPG cylinders, disputed the assessable value and duty payable on cylinders supplied to IOC. The appellant failed to include transportation charges from the Port to the factory in the price list, which was not disclosed by IOC. The appellant argued that the show cause notice was time-barred. The tribunal found that the omission of transportation charges was not wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. The appellant's omission was deemed bona fide as per the contract terms with IOC, where IOC was responsible for excise liability. Therefore, the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could not be invoked, and the show cause notice was considered barred by limitation. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.