Modvat credit timing: timely RG 23A entry preserves credit despite later formal accounting steps.

Modvat credit could not be denied where the assessee first entered the credit in RG 23A, Part-I within six months of the input document, even if the formal accounting entry was made later. The operative question was whether credit was first taken within the prescribed period; timely initial entry satisfied the requirement, and later corrective steps were only procedural. The Board circular and prior Tribunal view treated the bar as applying to initiation of credit beyond six months, not to completion of subsequent formalities after a timely entry. Substantive compliance under Rule 57G(2A) was therefore accepted, and the denial of credit was held unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied where the assessee had made the relevant entry in RG 23A, Part-I within six months from the date of the input document, though the formal credit entry was made later, and whether the grant of Modvat credit under Rule 57G(2A) was sustainable.

Analysis: The relevant consideration was the date on which credit was first taken in the records and whether that act occurred within the permissible six-month period from the date of the invoice or input document. The record showed that the assessee had entered the credit in RG 23A, Part-I within time, and the later procedural steps were only corrective or confirmatory. The Board's circular and the earlier Tribunal view recognised that what is barred is the initiation of credit beyond six months, not the completion of accounting formalities after a timely first entry. The Commissioner's finding that the case fell within Rule 57G(2A) and that there had been substantive compliance was therefore justified.

Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit to the assessee was unsustainable, and the Revenue's challenge to the grant of credit also failed.

---