Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a company wholly owned by the State Government qualifies as a factory "belonging to or maintained by" the State Government for the purpose of exemption under Notification No. 1/93.
Analysis: The exemption turned on the language of Explanation VIII to Notification No. 1/93. The company was a Government company within Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956, with 100% of its share capital held by the Kerala State Government. On that basis, it was treated as a fully owned State Government undertaking answering the description "belonging to or maintained by" the State Government. The interpretation adopted was consistent with the settled rule that exemption notifications are governed by their plain words.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to the exemption, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: The order granting exemption to the assessee was sustained, resulting in rejection of the Department's challenge.
Ratio Decidendi: A company wholly owned by the State Government can fall within an exemption meant for establishments "belonging to or maintained by" the State Government where the notification language so permits on a plain reading.