Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on inputs and packaging materials used in the manufacture of final products is admissible when the final products are assessed on tariff value and not on ad valorem assessable value under Section 4.
Analysis: The entitlement to Modvat credit under Rule 57A is not defeated merely because the final product is not assessed on the basis of Section 4 valuation. The decisive consideration is whether the inputs or packing materials are used in the manufacture of the final product. Where duty is levied on tariff value or on a specific basis, the requirement of showing inclusion of the input cost in the assessable value loses significance. The tariff value is fixed with reference to the product's wholesale price, and the cost of the inputs cannot be treated as wholly excluded from that value merely because the levy is not on ad valorem valuation. The consistent departmental circulars and tribunal decisions support admissibility of credit in such cases.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible to the respondents on the inputs and packing materials, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit cannot be denied on the ground that the cost of inputs or packing materials is not separately included in the value of the final product where the final product is not assessed on an ad valorem basis under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.