Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Colour Proofing Film used in the process of preparing Gravure Printing Cylinders was an input used in relation to manufacture so as to qualify for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The use of the Colour Proofing Film was not a mere post-manufacturing or disconnected activity. It was employed to obtain customer approval for the design and was an essential step in the preparation of Gravure Printing Cylinders, which were themselves used in the manufacture of the final printed product. The process had an integral nexus with the manufacture of the cylinders, and without such proofing the cylinders required for the customer's order could not be made. The activity therefore fell within the expression "in relation to manufacture".
Conclusion: The Colour Proofing Film was an input used in relation to the manufacture of Gravure Printing Cylinders and Modvat credit was admissible to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An item used in a process that is integrally connected with and necessary for manufacture is treated as used "in relation to manufacture" for Modvat credit purposes under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.