Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bar under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 applied to a suit for repossession of leased machinery owned by the plaintiff and whether a decree on admissions could be granted.
Analysis: The suit related to two diesel generating sets given on lease finance, with the lease terms expressly reserving ownership in the plaintiff and treating the equipment as the lessor's property. The defendant's plea of sickness and pending BIFR proceedings did not extend the statutory bar to assets not belonging to the company. Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 protects only the property and assets of the sick company, and cannot be invoked to resist repossession of leased equipment whose title remained with the financier. In view of the defendant's admissions regarding disbursement of the lease finance and default, the requirements for relief on admissions were satisfied.
Conclusion: The statutory bar was inapplicable, and the plaintiff was entitled to a decree on admissions for mandatory injunction directing delivery of possession of the diesel generating sets.