Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Official Liquidator should be directed to remove the seal/lock and hand over vacant possession of premises rented to the company in liquidation to the petitioner on specified terms under section 446 of the Companies Act.
Analysis: The petition seeks a direction under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 for delivery of vacant possession of premises formerly let to the company in liquidation. The Official Liquidator acknowledges the premises were let to the company and that the company in liquidation no longer requires the premises; some records and articles of the company remain at the premises. The parties have agreed terms: the petitioner will relinquish claims for arrears of rent and deposit Rs. 3,000 (Rs. 1,500 treated as value of assets and Rs. 1,500 for transportation of records to Jaipur). The Official Liquidator represents that the items' value does not exceed Rs. 1,500 and that retaining records at the premises imposes security and cost burdens. On these agreed terms, handing over possession is in the larger interest of the company in liquidation and facilitates preservation and transfer of company records.
Conclusion: Application allowed; Official Liquidator directed to hand over vacant possession of the premises to the petitioner within one month upon petitioner giving written waiver of arrears and depositing Rs. 3,000 as specified.