Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on conversion of the partnership firm into a private limited company under Part IX of the Companies Act, the copyright and other assets vested in the company by statutory vesting so that no separate written assignment was required under section 19 of the Copyright Act, and whether the plaint was liable to be rejected for want of cause of action.
Analysis: The company was found to have been incorporated under Part IX of the Companies Act with the partnership taken over as a going concern, the partners becoming shareholders, and the memorandum and articles showing compliance with the statutory requirements of that part. On that basis, the Court held that the company answered the description of a joint stock company and that section 575 of the Companies Act operated to vest the assets of the erstwhile partnership in the company by operation of law. Since the vesting was statutory, there was no transferor and transferee in the legal sense, and therefore no transfer of copyright requiring a written assignment under section 19 of the Copyright Act.
Conclusion: The plaint could not be rejected on the ground that there was no written assignment of copyright, because the copyright vested in the company by operation of law on conversion of the partnership firm into the company.