Refund entitlement tied to unresolved classification dispute makes unjust enrichment question premature

Passing on of duty incidence was held to be premature where refund entitlement itself depended on an unresolved classification dispute. Because the classification finding had not attained finality, the basic right to refund remained unsettled and the question of unjust enrichment could not be decided at that stage. The issue would arise only if refund entitlement was finally established. The appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal could be decided on the question of passing on the incidence of duty when the very entitlement to refund depended on the unresolved classification dispute.

Analysis: The refund had arisen from a classification finding that was itself under challenge and had not attained finality. Since the basic entitlement to refund was still in dispute, the question whether the duty burden had been passed on did not arise for present decision and would become relevant only if refund entitlement was finally established.

Conclusion: The issue of passing on the duty incidence was premature and did not require adjudication. The appeal was dismissed.

---