Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty on the footing that it was a job worker under Rule 57-S of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical facts and held that the expression "job worker" in Rule 57-S could not be equated with the meaning given to that term in exemption notifications such as Notification No. 214/86-C.E. The scheme of Rule 57-S, particularly sub-rules (8) to (10), was treated as dealing with removal of moulds and dies to a job worker for manufacture on behalf of the principal manufacturer, and not as requiring the same raw-material-based relationship contemplated by the exemption notification. Since the appellant had already paid duty in accordance with law and the issue was covered by prior Tribunal precedent, insistence on pre-deposit was not warranted.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived in favour of the appellant.