Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of the small-scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. could be denied merely because the constitution of a partnership firm changed while its name remained the same.
Analysis: The firm had already been registered as a small-scale unit and had been availing the exemption. The change was only in the partners of the firm, with three partners retiring and a new partner joining, while the firm's name continued unchanged. The registration with the Directorate of Industries was not shown to have ceased or required renewal merely because of this internal change in constitution. The exemption notification did not prescribe any condition that a fresh registration had to be obtained on every change in the constitution of the firm. In the absence of any change in the identity of the registered unit as reflected by its name and existing registration, the authorities were not justified in denying the exemption for the intervening period.
Conclusion: The denial of SSI exemption on the ground that fresh registration was necessary after change in partnership constitution was incorrect in law. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.