Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount demanded under Rule 57CC could be recovered in the absence of a specific machinery provision, and whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were warranted on the facts.
Analysis: The demand arose from alleged failure to reverse credit taken on duty-paid inputs used for both exempted and dutiable products. The Tribunal held that legislative intention alone was insufficient to sustain recovery unless supported by an express statutory mechanism. It noted the Board's circular requiring reversal of credit in such cases, but the exact quantum of reversable credit was not previously determined and could not be verified on the record. In these circumstances, the Tribunal considered it appropriate to direct reversal of a quantified amount in the Modvat account as a condition for granting interim relief.
Conclusion: The assessee was granted waiver of the demanded deposit and penalties, and recovery was stayed, subject to reversal of Rs. 7.50 lakhs in the Modvat account.
Ratio Decidendi: Recovery of an amount attributable to credit taken on inputs used in exempted manufacture requires an express statutory machinery provision, and interim relief may be conditioned on reversal of the credit where the precise amount is not otherwise verifiable.