Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit of duty on capital goods under Rule 57R(8) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was barred because the assessee had used the credit to pay duty on final products and had claimed such duty as revenue expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The restriction in Rule 57R(8) applies where the assessee claims depreciation under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or claims the specified duty element on capital goods as revenue expenditure. The rule does not, on its face, connect disallowance of Modvat credit with the later use of that credit for payment of excise duty on final products. The order also records a prima facie disagreement on whether such indirect tax treatment could defeat the rule, but the prevailing view was that the proviso does not extend that far at the interim stage.
Conclusion: The assessee had a prima facie case for continuance of Modvat credit, and unconditional stay of recovery and penalty was warranted.