Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order denying deemed Modvat credit required to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration in view of the certificates produced to show discharge of duty by the input manufacturer and the earlier Tribunal order.
Analysis: The appeal arose from denial of deemed Modvat credit on the ground that the certificate required under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. (N.T.) had not been produced. The record showed that certificates issued by the Central Excise Range Superintendent were produced before the lower appellate authority, but there was no indication that they were examined. The certificates prima facie reflected duty payment by the input manufacturer, while the appellant also relied on an earlier Tribunal order said to affect the duty liability reflected in those certificates. As the lower appellate authority had not considered these materials, the matter required reconsideration on a proper factual and legal basis.
Conclusion: The order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision on admissibility of deemed credit after considering the certificates and the earlier Tribunal order.
Ratio Decidendi: Where material documentary evidence relevant to admissibility of credit has not been examined by the appellate authority, the proper course is to set aside the order and remand the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the parties.