Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether lubricants used in limestone mines away from the cement factory during the relevant period were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The lubricants were treated as capital goods for the relevant period, but Rule 57Q also required that such capital goods be used in the factory of production of the final product. The lubricants in question were used in mines situated away from the factory. The same factual pattern had already been dealt with by the Supreme Court, which had denied Modvat credit in such circumstances. The issue was therefore covered against the appellant.
Conclusion: The lubricants used in the off-factory mines were not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q, and the claim failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Capital goods are eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q only when used in the factory of production; use of such goods in mines away from the factory does not satisfy the rule.