Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the glass shells returned by the customer were scrap or defective goods, and whether the assessee was entitled to refund of duty under Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The finding of the lower appellate authority that the returned goods were not scrap but defective glass shells was supported by the record and was not shown to be invalid. A view already taken in similar matters was followed that treating every defective return as scrap would make Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 ineffective.
Conclusion: The returned goods were defective glass shells and not scrap, and the assessee was entitled to refund of the duty originally paid under Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.