Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the duty and penalties demanded in the stay applications, and to what extent deposit should be insisted upon.
Analysis: The order noted that the applicants had not appeared despite repeated opportunities and had not filed replies, and therefore the plea of violation of natural justice was not accepted at the stay stage. On the material then available, the order found a prima facie case that the goods were manufactured and cleared without payment of duty, but also held that the scrap transferred within the exempted limit under Notification No. 7/97 did not attract duty. In view of the prima facie assessment, the order balanced the interests by directing deposit of part of the duty and one penalty, while waiving deposit of the other penalties, including the penalty on the assessee and its partner and the penalties on the connected persons.
Conclusion: The waiver applications were allowed in part. The applicants were required to make limited pre-deposits, but waiver was granted for the remaining penalties.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted only to a limited extent, with partial waiver of the demanded amounts and conditional pre-deposit of the balance.