Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was liable to be reversed in respect of inputs contained in waste and reprocessed granules cleared at nil rate of duty.
Analysis: Rule 57D of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 provided that credit of specified duty could not be denied or varied merely because part of the inputs was contained in waste, refuse or by-product arising during manufacture of the final product. The waste in question arose during the manufacture of the final product, and the credit attributable to the inputs contained in such waste could not be denied under Rule 57D. Rule 57F dealt with duty on clearance of waste from the factory, and the waste was exempted under Notification No. 53/88-C.E. The claim that recycling of the waste into sub-standard granules for clearance at nil rate of duty required reversal of Modvat credit was not accepted, because the statutory protection under Rule 57D continued to apply.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not liable to be reversed for the inputs contained in the waste, and the Revenue's rectification application was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit of duty on inputs cannot be denied or varied merely because part of the inputs is contained in waste arising during manufacture of the final product.