Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed credit under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. was admissible where the duty liability of the input manufacturers was under challenge and required verification after the Tribunal's earlier orders.
Analysis: The appeals concerning the input manufacturers had been either remanded or allowed by the Tribunal. In that situation, the question whether the manufacturers of the inputs had paid the appropriate duty could not be finally determined without fresh verification by the adjudicating authority. The matter therefore required reconsideration after affording the appellants an opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision.