Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sulphur melter, manufactured in the factory and later fitted in a tank, was excisable and whether the assessee was entitled to Modvat credit as capital goods.
Analysis: The melter came into existence as a manufactured product before being installed in the tank. Once goods are manufactured, they attract central excise duty; later fitting or attachment in a manner that makes removal difficult does not, by itself, negate excisability. On the facts found, the melter was manufactured first and then installed, so it could not be denied credit merely on the ground that it was attached to the earth.
Conclusion: The melter was held to be excisable, and the assessee was held entitled to Modvat credit as capital goods.