Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Nalcool used for de-mineralising water for DG sets was eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods or an eligible input under Rule 57Q. (ii) Whether unprocessed polyester polyside fabric and the listed spares/components were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods, parts or components under Rule 57Q.
Issue (i): Whether Nalcool used for de-mineralising water for DG sets was eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods or an eligible input under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The chemical was used only for treatment and de-mineralisation of water intended to maintain the DG sets. Such use was confined to maintenance of capital goods and not in or in relation to manufacture of cement. Credit under Rule 57Q was therefore not available on this item.
Conclusion: The claim for Modvat credit on Nalcool was rejected.
Issue (ii): Whether unprocessed polyester polyside fabric and the listed spares/components were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods, parts or components under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The fabric was used in air slides and shutes for transporting and fluidising cement and was treated as an essential industrial use forming part of the cement manufacturing equipment. The other listed items, including seals, felt, rubber ring, electrical grade sheet, grouting material and polymer liner, were found to function as parts, accessories or components of the plant and machinery used in cement manufacture. Denial of credit merely on the basis of their individual identity or chapter classification was not sustained.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was allowed on the unprocessed polyester polyside fabric and on the listed spares/components other than Nalcool.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were allowed in part, with credit denied only for Nalcool and allowed for the remaining items.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used only for maintenance of machinery and not in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product are not eligible for Modvat credit, whereas items functioning as essential parts, components or accessories of manufacturing equipment qualify for such credit.