Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to settlement of the admitted excise duty liability and consequential immunity from interest, penalty, fine, and prosecution under the settlement provisions.
Analysis: The applicant accepted the differential duty liability raised in the show cause notice and complied with the interim direction by debiting the admitted amount in the CENVAT account. The Commission recorded that the applicant had co-operated throughout the settlement proceedings and had made a full and true disclosure of the duty liability. On that basis, the Commission exercised its power to settle the duty under the settlement provisions and considered the applicant fit for relief from the consequential fiscal and penal consequences.
Conclusion: The duty liability was settled at the admitted amount, and immunity from fine, penalty, interest, and prosecution was granted to the applicant.