Duty payment evidence and lack of proven contravention defeated confiscation and penalty under central excise rules.

Duty payment evidenced by gate passes defeated confiscation for brass rods found in transit, as no contravention under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was established. The brass rods found in the factory were treated on the accepted facts as replacement material, so no separate duty liability or confiscation arose on that basis. Applying judicial discipline, the Tribunal followed its earlier view on similar facts. The confiscation, duty demand and penalty were set aside, and the connected liability of the truck owner under Rule 209A also failed with the assessee's success.

---

---

Issues: Whether confiscation, duty demand, and penalty were sustainable under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in respect of the brass rods found in transit and in the factory premises.

Analysis: The goods in transit were supported by gate passes evidencing payment of duty, and once duty payment was established, confiscation for breach of the rules could not be sustained. The quantity found in the factory premises was treated as replacement material and, on the facts accepted, no separate duty liability or confiscation followed. The Tribunal's earlier view on the effect of such circumstances was followed on the principle of judicial discipline. Since the appeal of the assessee succeeded, the liability of the truck owner under Rule 209A also could not survive.

Conclusion: The confiscation, duty demand, and penalty were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was annulled and the connected proceedings also failed as a consequence of the assessee's success.

Ratio Decidendi: Where duty payment is evidenced and the factual basis for unauthorised removal or contravention is not established, confiscation and penalties under the Central Excise Rules cannot be sustained.

---