Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption Notification No. 214/86-C.E. applied to scrap generated within the factory during manufacture from duty-paid raw materials received from outside.
Analysis: The exemption notification was meant for raw materials or semi-finished goods received by the assessee and sent out to job workers in circumstances covered by the scheme. It did not extend to scrap generated within the factory in the course of manufacture of final products out of raw materials brought from outside on payment of duty. The order also noted that the alternative plea based on Rule 57F(2) had not been examined and therefore required reconsideration by the appellate authority.
Conclusion: Notification No. 214/86-C.E. was not applicable to the scrap in question, while the alternative claim under Rule 57F(2) required fresh consideration on remand.
Final Conclusion: The exemption claim failed on the notified basis, but the matter was sent back for a speaking decision on the unaddressed alternative plea.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification for materials sent to job workers does not extend to scrap generated within the factory from duty-paid inputs, and any unconsidered alternative statutory plea must be separately examined before final disposal.