Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was payable on the duty demand for the period after the provision came into force, notwithstanding that part of the demand related to an earlier period.
Analysis: Interest under Section 11AB is not available for periods anterior to its insertion, but where the confirmed duty demand covers a span extending beyond the date on which the section became operative, interest is leviable on the portion of the demand relatable to the post-insertion period. The pendency or acceptance of findings relating to penalty under Section 11AC or Rule 173Q does not bar consideration of interest under Section 11AB when the Revenue has specifically challenged the denial of interest.
Conclusion: Interest under Section 11AB was held payable only for the part of the duty demand pertaining to the period from 28-9-96 to 8-9-97, and the Revenue's appeal succeeded to that extent.
Final Conclusion: The order denies retrospective application to the interest provision while sustaining interest liability for the post-commencement portion of the duty demand, resulting in partial relief to the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest provisions operate prospectively and are recoverable only for the period to which the statutory levy has already come into force.