Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 33/99-C.E. dated 08.07.1999 could be denied on the ground that the 25% increase in installed capacity was not achieved in each separate section of the factory, although the overall installed capacity had increased by more than 25%.
Analysis: The notification was construed as requiring an overall increase in the installed capacity of the factory. The decisive consideration was the total installed capacity of the manufacturing unit, not a section-wise or wing-wise increase. An identical issue had already been decided by the Tribunal in favour of the assessee, holding that the notification did not impose any condition that every individual section must be upgraded by 25%.
Conclusion: The benefit of the notification was rightly extended to the assessee, and the Revenue's objection based on section-wise capacity increase failed.