Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and interim protection in respect of duty and penalties, having regard to the claim that the fabricated pipelines were either not excisable goods or were covered by the exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E.
Analysis: The order notes the competing stands on whether the fabricated pipes, once laid in trenches, retained the character of movable excisable goods. It records the applicant's reliance on the departmental circular under Section 37B of the Central Excise Act and on Notification No. 67/95-C.E., which exempts capital goods manufactured in a factory and used within the factory of production. The Tribunal considered, at the interim stage, that if the pipes were treated as excisable goods, the benefit of the notification would be available, and thus the applicants had shown a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: The applications for waiver of pre-deposit were allowed and recovery of duty and penalties was stayed during the pendency of the appeals.