Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether crushing of boulders into stones of smaller sizes amounts to manufacture so as to attract central excise duty under Chapter 25 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the issue had earlier been decided against the appellants and that subsequent Tribunal decisions had consistently held crushing or grinding of limestone to be manufacture. It distinguished the sales tax decisions relied upon by the appellants, and relied on the Central Excise authorities holding that a process resulting in a commercially distinct product satisfies the test of manufacture. Applying the settled principle that excise duty is attracted when a process brings into existence a new commodity known to the market as a distinct article, the Tribunal held that crushing boulders into smaller stones produces excisable goods classifiable under Chapter 25.
Conclusion: Crushing of boulders into stones of smaller sizes amounts to manufacture and the resulting crushed stones are liable to central excise duty.
Final Conclusion: The duty demand was upheld, but the penalty was deleted because the dispute was one of interpretation, leaving the appellants with only partial relief.
Ratio Decidendi: A process is manufacture for excise purposes if it results in a commercially distinct product, and crushing boulders into smaller stones satisfies that test.