Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported high speed draw warping machine with a drawing unit, but without pneumatic suction devices, was covered by Notification No. 17/2001-Cus. dated 01-03-2001 and entitled to exemption.
Analysis: The notification exempted high speed warping machines with yarn tensioning, pneumatic suction devices and accessories. The imported machine was described as a high speed draw warping machine with essential spare, and the record showed that the drawing and warping functions were combined in one machine. The drawing unit was treated as part of the machine rather than a disqualifying addition, and the absence of pneumatic suction devices was not treated as fatal because the notification used the expression 'with' together with 'accessories', indicating that the provision was not to be read in a narrow or rigid manner. In view of the recommendation from the Textile Commissioner and the presence of separately exempted drawing and warping machines under the same notification, the exemption was construed liberally.
Conclusion: The imported goods were held to fall within the exemption notification and the denial of exemption was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the wording of an exemption notification is capable of a liberal construction and the goods fall within the composite description read in context, the exemption should not be denied merely because one listed accessory or device is not separately imported.