Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty demand and penal action were justified against a small-scale unit exempted from excise control, where some manufactured goods were not included in the earlier declaration and minor discrepancies were noticed in the unit's own registers.
Analysis: The unit had filed a declaration under the relevant exemption notification and was operating as a small-scale unit outside the normal excise control regime. The goods in question were held to be within the overall exemption limit when all declared and non-declared products were considered together. The register discrepancies were treated as minor and not a basis for adverse action, since the unit was not required to maintain the records on the statutory footing applicable to controlled units.
Conclusion: The demand of duty and the penalty were not sustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.