Chassis classification for exemption under vehicle tariff entry was doubted, leading to a partial pre-deposit in stay proceedings.

Exemption under Notification No. 4/97-C.E. depended on whether a trailer mounted on a customer-supplied chassis could itself be treated as a chassis for vehicles of Heading 87.16. The Tribunal took a prima facie view that a chassis is a supporting frame designed to carry something built upon it, and that a trailer ordinarily does not answer that description; explanatory notes and supplier descriptions did not by themselves establish chassis status. In the stay application, the Tribunal also considered the assessee's limited profitability and balanced revenue interests against hardship by directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 8 lakhs while waiving the balance of duty and penalty.

---

---

Issues: Whether the trailer mounted on the customer-supplied chassis could be treated as a chassis for the purpose of exemption under Notification No. 4/97-C.E., and what pre-deposit should be directed in the stay application.

Analysis: The claimed exemption applied to vehicles of Heading 87.16 manufactured by a person other than the chassis manufacturer, with the taxable value linked to the value of the chassis used. The Tribunal took a prima facie view that a chassis is a supporting frame intended to carry something built upon it, whereas the trailer involved in the case could not ordinarily be regarded as a chassis. The explanatory notes to Heading 87.16 and the description given by suppliers did not, by themselves, establish that the trailer answered the description of chassis. On financial hardship, the Tribunal noted the limited profit shown and considered it appropriate to balance the interests of revenue with the assessee's plea.

Conclusion: The Tribunal held prima facie against treating the trailer as a chassis for exemption purposes and directed a pre-deposit of Rs. 8 lakhs, waiving the balance of duty and penalty.

---