Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether centrifugal booster fans manufactured by the assessee were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 175/86-C.E. on the basis of their classification, and whether the Revenue had made out any ground to interfere with the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order.
Analysis: The earlier classification of the goods under Heading 8414.80 had not been shown to have been set aside, and that heading was covered by the exemption notification. The contrary classification under Heading 84.15 was not accepted as a reason to deny the benefit in the absence of any successful challenge to the prior order. The classification issue was treated as one to be decided on merits, and no ground for interference with the appellate order was found.
Conclusion: The exemption benefit was upheld and the Revenue's challenge failed.