Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether linear alpha olefin C-14 imported by the assessee was classifiable under Chapter 29 as a separate chemically defined organic compound, or under Chapter 27 as a petroleum oil or mixture of hydrocarbon isomers.
Analysis: The decisive question was whether the product was a mixture or a chemically defined compound. The testing report from IIT stated that the sample was a single chemically defined compound having known structural form and high purity, with impurities being minimal. On that basis, the product answered the description of a separate chemically defined organic compound. The objection based on possible isomers could arise only if the product were first shown to be a mixture. Chapter 29 applies to separate chemically defined organic compounds, while the exclusion relating to mixtures of acyclic hydrocarbon isomers does not govern a product already identified as a chemically defined compound. The contrary opinion did not displace the IIT finding that was clear and categorical on the nature of the goods.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 29.10 and not under Heading 27.10, and the assessee succeeded on the classification issue.