Tribunal denies stay modification application, directs compliance with order by specified date. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai denied the application for modification of a stay order, ruling that stay applications cannot be argued in parts. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal denies stay modification application, directs compliance with order by specified date.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai denied the application for modification of a stay order, ruling that stay applications cannot be argued in parts. The Tribunal directed the applicant to comply with the order by 10-6-2003, without allowing the requested deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs out of the demanded duty of Rs. 29.29 lakhs.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai considered an application for modification of a stay order, where the applicant requested to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs out of the demanded duty of Rs. 29.29 lakhs. The Tribunal refused modification, stating that stay applications cannot be argued in parts, and extended the time for compliance to 10-6-2003. (Citation: 2003 (7) TMI 328 - CESTAT, MUMBAI)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.