Transaction value cannot be rejected on journal price reports alone without independent evidence or disclosure to the importer.

Declared transaction value under Section 14 of the Customs Act and Rules 3 and 4 of the Customs Valuation Rules remains the starting point for customs valuation and may be rejected only on legally recognised grounds. Mere reliance on journal price reports, without independent evidence showing that the invoice price was not the price actually paid or payable, is insufficient to displace the declared value. Where the material used to challenge valuation is not disclosed to the importer for rebuttal, the process is unfair and the enhancement cannot stand. The stated principle is that suspicion or market indications alone do not justify rejection of transaction value.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared transaction value of the imported goods could be rejected and enhanced merely on the basis of journal price reports without independent material, and whether such reliance without disclosure of the material to the importer was sustainable.

Analysis: Under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Rules 3 and 4 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, the transaction value is the starting point for valuation and can be discarded only on legally recognised grounds. The declared prices were for commercial imports by an industrial user, and no independent evidence was produced to show that the invoice price was not the price actually paid or payable. The only basis for enhancement was a market journal report, which by itself was insufficient to create a valid doubt or displace the declared value. The material relied upon by the Revenue was also not furnished to the importer for rebuttal, rendering the process unfair.

Conclusion: The rejection of the declared value was unsustainable, and the enhancement of assessable value was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Declared transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules cannot be rejected on mere suspicion or journal-based price indications unless the Revenue establishes a legally sustainable ground for doubt and affords the importer a fair opportunity to meet the material relied upon.

---