Classification of goods as machinery upheld, with concessional tariff treatment sustained against Revenue's unsupported challenge.

Goods were classified as machinery under Chapter 84.22 and treated as eligible for the concessional rate under Notification No. 51/93 after the classification was supported by a Chartered Engineer's certificate, the individual functions of the goods, and Section Note 4 of Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Revenue did not place material before the Tribunal to displace the evidentiary basis accepted by the lower authority, and its challenge rested only on assertions. The Commissioner (Appeals)' classification was therefore upheld, and the Revenue's objection to concessional treatment failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned goods were correctly classified as machinery under Chapter 84.22 and entitled to the concessional rate under Notification No. 51/93, or were liable to be treated as parts or conveyor goods under the rival classifications proposed by the Revenue.

Analysis: The Revenue failed to produce any material before the Tribunal to dislodge the findings recorded in the order under appeal. The classification had been reached after considering the Chartered Engineer certificate, the individual functions of the goods, and Section Note 4 of Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Revenue's appeal was based only on assertions and did not rebut the evidentiary basis accepted by the lower authority.

Conclusion: The classification adopted by the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld, and the Revenue's challenge to the eligibility of the goods for the notified concessional treatment failed.

---