Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the chemical used in tea gardens for cultivation and protection of tea bushes, when the manufacturing process of tea begins only with the green tea leaves brought into the factory premises.
Analysis: The chemical was used outside the factory premises in the tea garden for growing and protecting tea bushes. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that only inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product qualify for credit, and that materials used for producing the raw material outside the factory do not become inputs of the manufacturing process. As the tea bushes were part of the cultivation stage and not the manufacturing stage, the nexus required for Modvat credit was absent.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible on the chemical used in the tea gardens, and the appeal was decided in favour of the Revenue.