Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned goods, being computer monitors, were classifiable under Heading 84.71 as output units of automatic data processing machines or under Heading 85.28 as video monitors.
Analysis: The HSN Explanatory Notes distinguish display units of automatic data processing machines from video monitors on the basis of signal source, connector type, bandwidth, scanning frequency, electromagnetic emission, and intended use. On the facts, the product was designed to function as a computer monitor and was to be assessed as cleared from the factory in that form. Its possible modification for use as a television receiver, or incidental other uses, did not govern its classification. The absence of an express mention of computer monitor under Heading 84.73 was held to be immaterial in view of the proper classification under Heading 84.71 as an output unit of a computer.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading 84.71 and not under Heading 85.28. The classification adopted by the lower authorities was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For tariff purposes, a product must be classified according to its essential character and intended function as cleared, and the HSN Explanatory Notes to the relevant heading are decisive where they specifically distinguish the competing entries.