Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether printed cartons, boxes, containers and cases manufactured from LDPE coated paper were entitled to the concessional duty exemption under Notification No. 67/82-C.E. while the manufacturer had availed credit of duty paid on the converted paper.
Analysis: The exemption was available only where the finished goods were made from duty-paid base paper or paper board used in their manufacture and the manufacturer had not taken credit of the input duty. The notification was construed to prevent simultaneous enjoyment of the concessional rate and credit of input duty. Since the appellant's goods were not made directly from duty-paid base paper or paper board, but from converted LDPE coated paper on which credit had been taken, the condition of the notification was not satisfied. The claimed indirect linkage to base paper was rejected as an impermissible technical construction.
Conclusion: The exemption was not available and the appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The manufacturer could not simultaneously claim the concessional duty benefit under the notification and credit of the duty on the intermediate input, and the denial of exemption was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification that grants a concessional rate subject to non-availment of input credit cannot be invoked where the finished goods are not manufactured from the specified duty-paid base material and the manufacturer has already taken credit on the intermediate input.