SSI exemption for branded goods used only by the brand owner upheld; no open-market trade shown and limitation objection failed.

SSI exemption could not be denied on branded elastic tapes manufactured exclusively for the brand owner's own use, because the goods were made to the buyer's specifications, sold only to that buyer, and not traded in the open market; the Department failed to show that the brand-name condition applied in course of trade, so the exemption was upheld. The limitation objection also failed because the notice was issued within six months from the relevant RT-12 return, so it was not time-barred.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether SSI exemption could be denied to branded elastic tapes manufactured exclusively for the brand owner's own use and not traded in the open market; (ii) whether the show cause notice was barred by limitation.

Issue (i): whether SSI exemption could be denied to branded elastic tapes manufactured exclusively for the brand owner's own use and not traded in the open market.

Analysis: The goods were manufactured with the buyer's brand name as per its design and specification and were sold only to that buyer, who used them in the manufacture of a different final product. The record showed no trading of the goods in the open market. The relevant Board clarification supported the position that brand name restrictions do not apply where branded goods are not traded and are fully consumed by the brand owner for its own use or in further manufacture. The Department did not adduce evidence to show that the goods were traded in the course of trade or that the brand-name condition was attracted.

Conclusion: SSI exemption was available and denial of the exemption was not justified.

Issue (ii): whether the show cause notice was barred by limitation.

Analysis: The notice was held to have been issued within six months from the filing of the relevant RT-12 return for the period ending 31-3-2001. On that basis, the objection of limitation was not accepted.

Conclusion: The show cause notice was not time-barred.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed on merits, with the assessee's entitlement to SSI exemption being upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Brand-name based SSI exemption cannot be denied when branded goods are manufactured exclusively for the brand owner's own use, are not sold in the open market, and the Department fails to establish use in the course of trade.

---