Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudication order was vitiated for want of jurisdiction in the absence of a notification authorising the Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), Mumbai to decide the show cause notice under the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The appeals turned on the competence of the authority that adjudicated the notices. The record showed that the notices had been issued in relation to imports at Sahar Air Cargo, while the impugned adjudication was carried out by the Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), Mumbai. In the absence of the requisite authorisation under the governing customs framework, the adjudicating authority lacked jurisdiction to decide the notices.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Customs having jurisdiction to adjudicate the show cause notice.