Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the absence of an express provision in the Estate Duty Act, 1953, interest is payable on refund of estate duty arising from an appellate order of the Tribunal.
Analysis: The Act provided for interest in specified situations, including under section 53(3) and section 64(7), and similar fiscal enactments also contained express refund-interest provisions. The Court held that in taxing statutes the decisive question is not whether there is a prohibition against interest, but whether the statute positively authorises it. Decisions relied on by the petitioner concerning equitable interest or delayed payment of money were distinguished as they did not concern refund of tax under a taxing statute. The Court applied the principle that tax refunds become legally due only when the assessment is modified or annulled in appeal, and that legislative provision for interest in some cases indicates a conscious exclusion in others.
Conclusion: Interest on refund of estate duty is not payable unless the statute specifically provides for it; the petitioner was not entitled to interest on the refunded amount.
Ratio Decidendi: In a taxing statute, a right to interest on refund exists only where the statute expressly provides for it; absence of prohibition is insufficient to create such entitlement.