Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether polymer liners manufactured by the assessee were classifiable under Chapter Heading 3926.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 in the light of the Board's circular, and whether the Department could still treat the plastic sheet arising in manufacture as a dutiable intermediate product under Chapter Heading 3920.38 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The circular dated 29-9-88 stated that polymer liners of ultra high molecular weight high density polyethylene, where further worked, would fall under sub-heading 3926.90 as "other articles of plastics". On that basis, the goods manufactured by the assessee were required to be classified directly under sub-heading 3926.90 without first treating the plastic sheet as a separate intermediate product. Since the circular was binding on the Revenue, it could not insist on treating the plastic sheet as captively consumed dutiable goods under sub-heading 3920.38.
Conclusion: The classification adopted in favour of the assessee was affirmed, and the Revenue's challenge to duty on the alleged intermediate product failed.