Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the electronic automatic regulator imported by the respondent was classifiable under Heading 9032.89 or under Heading 8543.89 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act.
Analysis: The classification depended on whether the goods answered the description of automatic regulating or controlling instruments and apparatus covered by Note 6 to Chapter 90 and the Explanatory Notes to Heading 90.32. Those notes contemplate a complete automatic control system consisting essentially of a measuring device, a controlling device, and a starting, stopping or operating device. On the material before it, the goods received signals from remotely mounted sensors and sent signals to remotely mounted actuators and valves, but did not themselves satisfy the requirement of having the necessary operating device within the meaning of the heading. The finding that the goods did not satisfy the HSN explanatory requirements was not rebutted.
Conclusion: The goods did not qualify for classification under Heading 9032.89 and were not entitled to the respondent's claimed classification.
Final Conclusion: The tariff classification claimed by the respondent was rejected and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: For classification under Heading 90.32, the goods must satisfy the composite characteristics of an automatic control system as contemplated by the relevant chapter note and HSN Explanatory Notes, including the requisite measuring and operating functions.