Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on the ground that the application for a subsidiary certificate was made after receipt of the inputs, and whether the Board circular governing subsidiary certificates could be used as the basis for the show cause notice.
Analysis: The circular was directed to the Range Superintendent and required issuance of the subsidiary gate pass within twenty-four hours of receipt of the application; in the event of default by the Superintendent, there was no bar on removal of goods pending receipt of the certificate. The circular therefore governed the departmental and did not impose a bar on the assessee. The order also noted that physical receipt of inputs and receipt of Modvat documents need not be simultaneous, and Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 recognized this position through its proviso. Since the notice itself showed that credit was taken only after receipt of both the inputs and the documents, no mala fides could be attributed to the assessee.
Conclusion: The demand could not be sustained on the basis of the circular, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: A departmental circular binding only on officers cannot be used to deny Modvat credit to an assessee where the statutory rule permits credit despite non-simultaneous receipt of inputs and documents and no mala fides are established.