Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on radiant coil, as part of a Thermal Fluid System installed in the appellant's factory, could be denied on the ground that heat generated by the system was extended to a neighbouring factory.
Analysis: The radiant coil was treated as an integral component of the Thermal Fluid System installed in the appellant's factory. The fact that heat generated from the system had been extended outside the factory did not alter the character of the capital goods used in the factory for production. The reasoning adopted in the cited departmental decision concerned power generated by a D.G. set being distributed to another unit, which was materially different from the present facts. On the facts found, there was no basis to deny the credit merely because some heat was utilised elsewhere.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the radiant coil was admissible and the denial was unsustainable.