Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to small scale exemption when the brand name used on its goods was registered in its own name in India, notwithstanding the existence of a foreign company with the same brand name.
Analysis: The notifications governing small scale exemption denied the benefit where a manufacturer affixed the brand name of another person. The decisive factor was the ownership of the trade mark in India. The brand name was found to have been registered in the assessee's favour by the trade marks authority, which conferred an exclusive right to use the mark in relation to the registered goods. Once the mark stood registered in India in the assessee's name, no other person could claim the right to use it in India for those goods. The mere existence of a foreign company with the same name did not alter the assessee's legal entitlement, particularly when no claim was made to the Indian trade mark.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the small scale exemption, and the bar relating to use of another person's brand name did not apply.
Final Conclusion: The denial of exemption was unsustainable, and the appeals succeeded with the impugned order set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: A brand name registered in the assessee's name in India is not the brand name of another person for purposes of the small scale exemption notifications, and foreign ownership unasserted in India does not defeat that entitlement.