Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Tel Rahat Rooh is classifiable as an Ayurvedic medicament under Heading 3003.30 or as a preparation for use on the hair under Heading 33.05 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: Heading 33.05 covers preparations for use on the hair, while Chapter 30 is excluded where the goods fall within Chapter 33. The product was not shown to be used on the advice of a medical practitioner, nor was evidence produced that it cured any disease in the manner of a medicine prescribed for limited therapeutic use. Mere references on the label or literature to possible relief or usefulness did not establish the product as an Ayurvedic medicament. Applying the reasoning adopted in earlier decisions on similar products, the tariff classification depended on the nature and use of the product, not on assertions on the package.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classifiable under Heading 33.05 of the Central Excise Tariff and not under Heading 3003.30.
Ratio Decidendi: A product falling within preparations for use on the hair cannot be treated as an Ayurvedic medicament merely because it has therapeutic claims or is marketed with ayurvedic ingredients; classification depends on its predominant character, use, and proof of medicinal prescription.