Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suspension of the customs house agent licence under Regulation 21(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was sustainable when the order did not set out the gist of the allegations and the proceedings showed no instituted action under the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: Regulation 21(2) permits immediate suspension only in exceptional cases requiring urgent action. For such an to stand, the order must disclose the basic facts and allegations showing why immediate suspension was necessary. The record showed uncertainty as to the role of the person concerned, lack of clarity about the alleged misdeclaration, and no instituted proceedings under the Customs Act, 1962. In that setting, the suspension order did not furnish adequate reasons and was treated as premature and non-speaking.
Conclusion: The suspension order under Regulation 21(2) could not be sustained and was rightly set aside in favour of the appellant.